Alumni Updates

Thanks to these brothers for responding to our recent alumni email survey! If you’d like to submit an update of your own for publication in an upcoming e-letter or a future edition of our alumni newsletter, email us your updates and photos at [email protected].

 

George Morriss ’69

My wife Sue and I are true snowbirds, splitting our time between Grand Haven, MI (primary) and Guilford, CT.  We celebrated our 50th anniversary earlier this year in the Turks and Caicos after being totally surprised by our three children, their spouses, and 6 grandchildren at the location of our wedding reception.

My favorite place to go in Philadelphia was 3809 Locust Walk, I could always find a brother to have a lively conversation with and, of course, Bob Gordon was usually there. I enjoyed the football games; they provided a chance to connect with brothers and friends and enjoy Penn traditions.  I usually try to go to a game every year. The most valuable part of my Sigma Chi experience was the fellowship, we could be individuals on a large campus.

 

Mina Mishrikey ’00

Leslie (Class of 2002) and I live right in the City and welcome seeing old friends. We have 3 kids, Jack (7), Charlie (5), Layla (3). I’m working in Private Equity and Leslie is an employment lawyer at a firm called something very long and with many names. I have fond memories of Sigma Chi and have friendships that I maintain to this day.

We live in Center City in the Fitler neighborhood, so taking my kids to the Schuylkill River Park or Fitler Park is a common occurrence. We are right across the river from campus, where I like to go to a tree we planted for a friend (to many of us Phi Phi’s) who passed away in our college years, it is right off the walk next to the Arts Library entrance. 

 

Michael Rosko ’71

I Retired 2 years ago after serving as a Professor at Widener University. I still teach as an Adjunct Professor at the Perelman School of Medicine, where I have served for over a decade.

When I was on campus, the Palestra was my favorite place to go for all the great b-ball games. Off of campus, I frequented The Phila Art Museum, for obvious reasons. Homecoming was a great event, I loved to see the older Phi Phis return to campus. By the way, this Fall marks the 50th anniversary of the time the undefeated Phi Phis won the All-university Intramural Flag Football Championship. Back then Phi Phis did not win intramural championships very often so this was an unexpected and extra-special delight that bonded the Brothers even closer.

Chapter House – New Compactors, Service Court and Parking Lot Improvements

Over the summer, our chapter house infrastructure was improved with the addition of a new set of three vertical stack trash and recycling compactors that will replace the unsightly dumpster corral that blocked the view from our dining room. (Gone also will be the ever-popular, though the unsafe practice of dumpster target tossing from the fire escape!) The project, funded by University central resources, also including the regrading and repaving of the parking lot. These improvements will make way for a proposed reconstruction of the historic back porch, adjacent to the dining room and will provide an ADA-accessible entrance to the house. Architectural design for the porch is now underway for a planned summer 2021 installation.

Sigma Chi National’s Statement on Racial Justice

“Our hearts mourn the loss of George Floyd and there are strong arms around any of our brothers who have ever faced injustice and adversity because of their national origin, religion, sexual orientation, or race.” As the nation continues to be rocked by protests in the wake of the deaths of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and so many other Black Americans, Sigma Chi National has released a statement expressing continued support for equality and justice.  

To learn how you can take action today, click here. 

Remembering Penn Campus Traditions!

There’s one thing we’re certain about in 2020, it’s that everything is uncertain. Just ask any corporate advertisement ever (watch this video for a laugh).

New announcements about fall at Penn are coming out every day, and it seems like many of our favorite campus activities are being postponed, moved online, or even canceled altogether. Many universities are canceling athletics too, meaning we’re likely to miss our favorite tailgates and homecoming in Philadelphia.

Current Quakers may miss out on many of the things we loved about our Penn experience. But in the midst of these unfortunate cancellations, we suggest looking back on better days. In remembering our traditions, we reassure ourselves that someday they will return, for us and future generations of Quakers to enjoy.

We’d like to remind you of 3 traditions that made coming back to campus feel like coming home.

Hey Day 

In 1916, Hey Day was established as a “Moving-Up” celebration to mark the advancement of each class. In recent decades, Hey Day has represented the official passage of the junior class to senior status and is characterized by thousands of marching students parading around campus and wearing red T-shirts, carrying canes, and biting into fake straw hats. 

Spring Fling 

Since the ’70s, Spring Fling has been the ultimate student festival at Penn. Beginning in 1972, with attendance between ten and fifteen thousand, students descend onto the Quad, Hill Square, College Green, and Wynn Commons to dance, eat, party, and enjoy a day full of surprises. Each Spring Fling consists of a carnival with games and events, a concert hosting high-profile bands, and the Quad concerts, which showcase some of the hottest local bands and performers.

Toast 

Penn fans throw toast onto Franklin Field after the third quarter of every home football game. The toast-throwing tradition was in response to the line “Here’s a toast to dear old Penn” in the school song “Drink a Highball”. The act of throwing toast was adopted after alcohol was banned from the stadium in the 1970s. In a good season, 20,000 to 30,000 pieces of toast are thrown per game! 

CHAPTER ETERNAL: Norman Wohlken ‘54

We regret to inform you of the passing of Brother Norman Wohlken ‘54 on Feb 1, 2020. We have lost a fine brother. Thank you to Martha Wohlken for sending in this update.

Norman Wohlken ‘54 had the motto “to serve” when he was President of Kite & key and clerk of Friar Senior Society. And his heart was a SX. When a clothing store launched a “Mr. Pennsylvania” contest with a dozen nominees, SX nominated Norman and he won. His motivation had to do with the $500 prize attached to it – enough to get him room and board. Along the way, the SX had the opportunity to cajole and joke about it all. He led a good and full life. 

We send our sincere condolences to the family of this fine gentleman and we honor his memory. Rest in Peace, Walter.

Alumni Update

We would like to say thank you to Michael Sanford Hoffman ’79 for sending in an alumni update. We always appreciate hearing from our alumni! If you would like to submit your own update, to be uploaded to the website and featured in the future, you can email our alumni relations partner at [email protected]. You can also post directly by submitting an update on the website; CLICK HERE to do that! 

Here is what your Brother had to say:

“I’ve moved to southern Vermont for my cherry career, at 60 for the next 30 years. I’ve bought HeartStorm Farmstead, which we imagine can be a wonderful health and wellness retreat. Together with my spouse, Kimberly, we have 50 animals, I’ve two sons, one doc and one health exec, and a 2 years old grandson, Elijah. When the world reopens, I welcome fellow Sigs.

Chapter Eternal: Brother Walter Glotfelty ’63

We regret to inform you of the passing of Brother Walter Glotfelty ’63 on April 7, 2015. We have lost a fine brother.

Walter Lang Glotfelty, age 75, passed away April 7, 2015, in San Antonio, TX. He was a kind, loving, thoughtful, and generous Husband, Son, Father, Grandfather, and Friend.

Born on February 12, 1940, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He was preceded in death by his parents Dr. Charles and Eleanor Glotfelty of Pittsburgh. 

Lang attended Mercersburg Academy and then went to The University of Pennsylvania Wharton School, where he was a member of the Sigma Chi Fraternity.

After graduating from Penn, he worked for Gulf Oil before becoming a successful entrepreneur for the next 40 years. He sold his last three companies in 2009 and retired for a short time before becoming involved with nonprofits.

He was chairman of Score and chairman of the Master Leadership Program Alumni Association. He served on the boards of Golf San Antonio, CTRC, The Master Leadership Program, The Blood and Tissue Center, and many other non-profit boards in San Antonio.

Lang is survived by his beautiful wife Judy Beckner Glotfelty, Son James Walter Glotfelty and his wife Molly of Houston and their three boys Chase, Walker, and Mitchell; twin Grandchildren Kathryn Anne Hodges and Stephen Scott Hodges; and Son Cole Humphreys and his wife Beth of San Antonio and their three children Coleman, Emma and Paige.

His 8 Grandchildren knew him affectionately as “Pops”. Lang loved to travel the world with his best friend and wife Judy. They generally took 2 or 3 foreign vacations per year, and never found a country they did not love.

Lang’s love, generosity, influence, and sense of humor will live on forever in our hearts.

We send our sincere condolences to the family of this fine gentleman and we honor his memory. Rest in Peace, Walter.

Maury Nunes ’70, Passionate About Sigma Chi Because of History, Friendship

Why did you join Sigma Chi as an undergraduate?

When I was an Undergrad, it seemed to me that the best opportunity for social life and the way to associate with the best people on campus was to join a fraternity. I was lucky enough that in Army ROTC, a Cadet Captain named Jim Visceglia noticed me and changed my life by inviting me up to the House for a Rush function. From then on I was hooked on Sigma Chi, not only because of the Brothers and the facility but also because of the history. To me, Sigma Chi was a way to connect with the history of the United States from before the Civil War through the present in a way that I never had before. That added plus put Sigma Chi several notches above the other 4 or 5 houses that I rushed.

What is the funniest memory from your Sigma Chi days?

There are many, but the wit of the late William Loren Sharron ‘68 and that of Eric “the Red” LeSchander ‘68 stand out as consistent bright lights.

What is the single fondest memory you have shared/will share with your children and grandchildren?

Presiding over my first Chapter Meeting as Consul with an altered candelabra.

How do you stay connected with your brothers as an alumnus?

I stay connected mostly by email and by attending events from time to time as well as by coming back to the Chapter House for occasional homecomings and other events. I also belong to the Washington Area Alumni Chapter, but I believe I am the only Phi Phi active there.

Have you visited Penn since graduation? Why or why not?

I’ve been back many times. My son is a 2006 grad, though he joined Phi Kappa Sigma to my disappointment.

What about your membership in Sigma Chi makes you the proudest?

I am a Life-loyal Sig and I believe that Sigma Chi is and always has been the best fraternity in the world.

How would your life be different today if you had never joined Sigma Chi?

That would be speculation of the most intense kind. I can say that Sigma Chi was the focal point of my undergraduate life and made the greatest difference in my maturing from a 17-year-old freshman in the fullest sense of that word to be ready for the responsibilities of adulthood.

If you could go back and relive one moment from your Sigma Chi years, what would it be and why?

The game of football we played on our knees in the second-floor hallway in which the entire house was involved in my Junior year stands out.

Where has life taken you since graduation? What’s new in your life today?

To summarize 41+ years is tough. I married my high-school sweetheart, Janie Chargar, in August after graduating and we had two children together and stayed married for 32 years until her untimely death from cancer in 2002. Since then I remarried another widower, Ruth Warsoff, a nurse and we just celebrated our 5th anniversary. I worked briefly in public accounting and then in the family business before going to Georgetown Law where I worked my way through school with a local brokerage firm and an electric utility. In 1977 I opened my own law practice representing privately held businesses and non-profits and still do that. Since 1990 I have been teaching part-time at Catholic University’s Law School and since 1998 at

Georgetown, initially in its Law School and in its MBA Program since 2003. I’ve been somewhat active in Metro DC GOP political circles and as a result, I have served for 8 years on the Board that oversees licensing of commercial activities in Virginia, with 6 years as Chair of that Board. I’ve written 5 books on business and legal subjects and dozens of published articles. I still play racquetball and squash as well as bicycling regularly. In fact, Ruth and I met on a Bike Vermont trip in Maine in 2005. I still play poker, but about as poorly as I did at Penn.

No doubt I have my regrets, too, and wonder still if I might have accomplished more with my life if I had been able to see the future with less emotion and made better decisions accordingly, but there is no doubt that one decision that I would never change was the decision to join Sigma Chi.

Who do you stay connected with in your alumni years? Are there any brothers you’ve lost touch with whom you’d like to reconnect?

I’m still connected with Bill Schmidt ‘69, Charlie O’Neill ‘69, Tom Farrell ‘68, George Morriss ‘69, and Gary Eames ‘70. I have also heard from Kevin Munroe ‘71 and definitely owe him a reply. Among older alumni, I stay in touch with Murray McComas ‘58 and Jon Greenawalt ‘61 as well as younger Alums Mark Kocent ‘82, Ron Woodmansee ‘82, and other Trustees, as I am privileged to serve as pro bono counsel for the Chapter. I would like to get back in touch with Frank Polidora ‘71.

Why would you encourage other brothers to engage with Sigma Chi in their alumni years?

There is no better way to preserve the spirit of youth than to stay connected with Sigma Chi.

Reconnect with Maury at [email protected].

The Quakers Plan For Coming Back

Brothers, I know you must be wondering what the University’s plans are for the Fall 2020 semester in light of recent developments regarding COVID-19. The following is sourced from Penn’s website: 

Penn’s Plans for the Fall Semester

A Message to the Penn Community

From:

Amy Gutmann, President

Wendell Pritchett, Provost

Craig Carnaroli, Executive Vice President

The events of the past four months have shown us, more than ever before, the profound importance of our shared communities. In March, our on-campus community became a virtual community, dispersed across the world. We began to live literally apart, our faces covered. Then we were powerfully reminded of the fragility of our human community, of the bonds that can both bring us together and tear us apart, in relation to the most significant issues of social equity and racial justice. 

In this context, we are writing to you today about our plans for the fall semester. We are one Penn community and we look forward to coming together on campus as soon as we can. In the meantime, we have a communal responsibility to preserve our shared health and safety, all the while sustaining our commitments to teaching, learning, research, and service. We are asking every member of our community to do your part, as we will too, to uphold these ever more essential missions. 

To develop our plans for the fall, the University convened a Recovery Planning Group (RPG), made up of representatives across all the major areas of our campus. Their planning has been guided by the latest medical information and governmental directives, and we want to thank the RPG members and all who supported them for their tireless work in addressing the myriad details involved in bringing students back to campus and in restarting our research enterprise.

Based on the meticulous recommendations of the RPG, we are announcing today a fall semester that will be a hybrid model. It will allow many students to return in a limited and careful way by incorporating online and virtual learning with on-campus classroom instruction where it can be provided safely and when it is essential to the academic needs of the course curriculum.

Campus life under this new model will need to be different for the fall semester. Large lectures will all be online, as will some graduate and professional programs. Gatherings will be limited in size. Housing accommodations will be at a lower density. Everyone on campus will need to practice physical distancing, wear face coverings, and agree to testing and contact tracing. Administrative and academic support functions that can do so will continue to operate remotely. We are confident that we can provide our students with both a world-class education and also a campus experience that will be rewarding and meaningful.  With everyone on campus affirming their willingness and doing their part to help themselves and others stay safe, we can provide a robust and meaningful Penn education in a manner that is as safe as possible for all involved.

There will be more specific details and communications to come before the start of the semester. It is possible that some plans could change, depending upon the progression of the virus and/or applicable state and local government guidance, but here is the current summary of steps we are implementing to enable as many people who wish to come back in the fall as possible, while also minimizing person-to-person transmission and making the campus work well during this pandemic:

Campus Life

  • Student Campus Compact has been developed so that together we can maintain a safe, educational, and vibrant learning environment for all members of our Penn community. The Compact outlines specific behaviors expected of all who are on campus, including:
    • Wearing a face covering at all times when in public places.
    • Maintaining physical distancing (6 feet or more) at all times and avoiding crowds greater than 25.
    • Frequent washing of hands.
    • Participating in student clubs, performances, and recreational activities in accordance with physical distancing guidelines and safety protocols.
  • On-Campus Student Residences. To ensure as safe a housing environment as possible, all students (including those in Greek housing) will be housed in private bedrooms with a maximum ratio of 6 students per shared bathroom. The College House system will make housing available for all first-year undergraduates, transfer undergraduates, and second-year undergraduate students who applied for housing. We anticipate being able to accommodate a percentage of third- and fourth-year students and have developed a priority process for assignment.  The University is also leasing additional space off-campus to make housing available to third-and fourth-year undergraduate students who applied for on-campus housing but are unable to be accommodated. For those returning graduate students who already have confirmed placements in University housing in Sansom Place East, existing placements will be honored.  Additional specific information about housing assignments will be forthcoming.
  • Campus Dining. Self-serve options such as salad bars will not be offered in campus dining facilities during the pandemic. Students will be offered take-out and pre-packaged meals, which can be pre-ordered. Consistent with government guidelines, we anticipate limited indoor and outdoor seating at dining facilities, and meals can be eaten in students’ rooms, designated small gathering spaces in College Houses, and other locations around campus.
  • Penn Athletics. A final decision on fall athletic competition has not yet been announced by the Ivy League. That announcement is expected in July. The Athletic Department will communicate directly to student-athletes when more information is available.

Measures to Promote and Sustain Campus Health and Hygiene

  • Testing and Contact Tracing. All students will be tested for COVID-19 when they first arrive on campus. Additional testing will be available throughout the year for students, faculty, and staff in the Hall of Flags at Houston Hall. We also ask that, if at all possible, students get tested before they depart home for campus and stay home if they test positive. To lower the risk of COVID-19 spread on campus, we are developing a digital approach that includes:
    • Daily symptom checking for everyone on campus using texting or a mobile app as a condition for entry into buildings.
    • Contact tracing efforts facilitated by a digital platform that stores GPS location data in users’ smartphones to serve as a memory aid when they are speaking to contact tracers. Information collected will remain the property of the phone owner.
    • Quarantine space in Sansom West for students testing positive while on campus.
  • Classroom Reconfiguration. All large lectures will be delivered online. In-class instruction will involve greater physical spacing of students, as well as plexiglass separators at lecterns where appropriate.
  • Enhanced Cleaning Protocols. In addition to normal cleaning procedures, enhanced cleaning and disinfection protocols will be employed in all campus buildings.

Fall Semester Calendar

  • Start and End of On-Campus Undergraduate Instruction. The academic semester will start as scheduled on Tuesday, September 1. Due to the inherent disease transmission risks associated with travel to and from campus, there will be no Fall Break and the last day of instruction on campus for undergraduates will be Friday, November 20.  Classes will only be offered online on Monday, November 23, and remain online through the end of the semester, including final exams which conclude on Tuesday, December 22. To be clear, undergraduate students will leave campus and not return to campus after the Thanksgiving break.  On-campus housing fees for the fall will be prorated consistent with the shortened on-campus schedule.
  • Move-in, Orientation, and Other Dates. To ensure less density during move-in, student arrival will be staggered. The exact move-in dates for the College Houses and other University residences will be sent to students in the coming weeks. New Student Orientation will be predominantly delivered online and program content will become available Monday, August 24, with activities continuing until Monday, August 31 with Convocation held later that day. 

Academics and Instruction

  • Hybrid Instruction. Our hybrid model of instruction will allow students the maximum flexibility in meeting their academic requirements and will ensure that students who choose not to return to campus are afforded the same high-quality education from our world-renowned faculty. For those students who are unable to return to campus (for example, international students who cannot travel, or students with health conditions) or others who prefer, for personal reasons, to remain off campus, fall course offerings will be accessible remotely, with predominantly online delivery. In-person academic experiences will be offered for some courses across those curricula that demand them, but accommodations will be provided for those students who cannot participate in person.  
  • Enhanced Online Experience. Since moving classes online for the end of the spring semester, Penn has undertaken extensive work through its Online Learning Initiative (OLI), Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL), and several faculty working groups across campus to enhance online course delivery for the fall. Penn is a pioneer in online learning and new forms of teaching and learning, and OLI and CTL are working together with our schools and programs to actively support faculty needs and will continue to do so.
  • Academic Policies and Grading. All regular academic policies in the four undergraduate schools will be unchanged from typical fall terms, including those that govern grading and deadlines. Graduate and professional programs may make policy changes depending on the specific needs of individual programs.
  • Libraries. Penn Libraries will follow the University’s guidelines for population density within each library. The library staff will be available to assist all faculty and students remotely, and the libraries will prioritize Faculty Express (with home delivery instead of office delivery); restart Books by Mail for all other members of the Penn community; and offer a new service, Pickup@Penn, for members of the Penn community to request books and pick them up outside Van Pelt-Dietrich Library Center.
  • Graduate and Professional Programs. Graduate and professional programs, while following all University, state, and city public health guidelines, will organize their fall semesters in ways specific to their disciplines and individual curricular needs. For example, unlike the University as a whole, some programs will operate completely online in the fall. Students will be provided with details directly by their programs.

Faculty, Staff, and Postdocs

  • Workforce Return to Campus. In consultation with the relevant personnel, the schools and centers will determine which work must be conducted on campus and which can be done at home and develop a plan to make it possible for work to be done well in both environments. To ensure that their return to campus is as safe as possible, individuals whose work is being done remotely will only return to campus when notified by their school or center leadership that it is appropriate to do so. Those who return to campus in any capacity must follow the Penn COVID-19 prevention guidelines outlined in the Penn Guide to Return to Work, which will be mailed to all employees’ homes in early July, and also posted on the Human Resources website. The current plan is to return staff to campus in three phases. Accommodations will be made for those with medical conditions who are unable to return to campus and need to continue working remotely.
  • Phase 1: Those whose jobs can only be performed on campus.
    • They will be relatively few in number and will help test and refine procedures and practices to minimize the spread of COVID-19.
    • Population density restrictions will be enforced.
  • Phase 2: Increase the numbers of those reporting to campus.
    • More people will return to campus, in positions where they need to report to campus to complete certain tasks; other tasks can still be done remotely.
  • Phase 3: Telework will continue to be utilized where possible.
    • Faculty and staff who do not need to be onsite to perform their job functions may be able to return to campus if they wish and their school or center leadership conclude it is safe and desirable to do so. 
  • Travel. Very limited business-related travel will be permitted and only as authorized. To be authorized, any University-related travel will need to be essential and to facilitate work that can be done in no other way. All travel will require pre-approval.  Students will also commit to stay on or close to campus between the beginning of the semester and the Thanksgiving break.
  • Face Coverings. Faculty and staff returning to campus will be required to wear a face covering. All faculty and staff members will receive a cloth face covering when they receive the Penn Guide to Return to Work.

Restarting Research

  • Research. We have already begun a phased implementation to open research labs at Penn. Presently the research resumption has successfully welcomed nearly 800 people back to campus who opted in and are working productively as part of Phase I.  The goals of restarting research are to sustain the highest levels of research excellence and continue to prioritize research related to COVID-19 while mitigating risks to the health and safety of the Penn community and minimizing any adverse impacts on Penn’s research enterprise, especially the most promising early-stage research. It will proceed in three phases:
    • Phase I: Increase of prioritized research, with enforced population density restrictions and telework.
    • Phase II: Expanded scope of research operations, increasing the population with social distancing enforced, telework.
    • Phase III: Return to full research operations, with new awareness and hygiene practices as the norm and telework utilized where possible.

Support for Students, Faculty, Postdocs, and Staff

All support services will continue to be available for both students and Penn employees. Two key programs to remember in challenging times are:

  • Counseling and Psychological Services. CAPS can connect with students either via phone or video conference, as well as in person. If students have been receiving care through CAPS, their counselor will continue to communicate with them about their needs moving forward. For students who are looking to initiate care, CAPS remains committed to offering free and confidential support as the need determines. You can visit CAPS at: https://caps.wellness.upenn.edu
  • Employee Assistance Program. Penn has a robust Employee Assistance Program available to help faculty, staff, postdocs, and their loved ones with resources to help navigate situations that can be emotionally troubling.

Updated Information, Questions, and Future Communications

  • Information and Further Communications. Updated information about the Fall Semester can be found at the fall semester planning website as it becomes available. Please refer to this site, which will have FAQs and links to other important information, as questions arise. We will also be sending further information about the fall semester to the entire Penn community, and individual schools, centers, and programs will be communicating directly with those who are impacted by any changes in their operations.
  • Questions. For questions that cannot be answered in the Penn Guide to Return to Work, the Campus Student Compact, fall semester website and FAQs, department or school websites, or other University Communications, you can email: [email protected]

What makes this plan robust—and what will maximize its success in among the most trying of times—is nothing less than the resourcefulness, resilience, and responsiveness of every member of the Penn community in carrying out our uplifting historic mission. We have grown and thrived for more than 250 years, and this is the way we will continue to do so in the months and years to come. This is the strength and power of the Penn community.

The most critical factor in this plan—for all its important details—is the most human one of all: that every member of the Penn community does our best to maximize its success. Keeping our beloved University and community health and educationally vibrant is a goal we all share.

We welcome your feedback and questions. We will monitor the pandemic and any impact it could have on our plans and will continue to provide updated information in the weeks ahead.

This information is sent to all members of the University of Pennsylvania community. The message has been approved for distribution by the University Communications Office, the Office of the Provost, or the Division of Human Resources and is of importance to the University of Pennsylvania community.

These lists are automatically generated based on active status with the University. If you have received this message and are no longer employed by the University of Pennsylvania, please contact Human Resources from your previous appointment to request that your records be updated to reflect your current status.

Please address questions or comments about the content of this message to the contact listed within the message.

Please address questions or comments about University-wide communications to University Communications, [email protected].

Phi Phi Chapter History

As we approach our 100 anniversary at 3809 Locust this fall, here is a remarkable history of the early days of the founding and re-establishment of the Phi Phi Chapter at the University of Pennsylvania. Apparently, the Chapter went inactive for one or two brief periods after it was founded in 1875. This document covers the chapter’s renewal in the 1890s from which time it has remained active. There is an interesting summation of the addresses we had prior to our acquiring the Drexel-Paul home at 3809 Locust in 1920.

THE HISTORY OF SIGMA CHI

Joseph C. Nate

Volume V

Chapter I

THE ADMINISTRATION OF BENJAMIN P. RUNKLE AS GRAND CONSUL

1895 – 1897

The Phi Phi Chapter Re-Established, May 9, 1896

The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

 

It was good news in Sigma Chi when the word went out in the Spring of 1896 that a strong and worthy movement was underway for the revival of the Phi Phi Chapter at the historic University of Pennsylvania. Behind the movement was the splendid story of the former chapters in Philadelphia, with their intermingled histories of victory and defeat. These were the old Upsilon, the seventeenth chapter of Sigma Chi, founded in 1865 and becoming inactive in 1876; and the earlier Phi Phi. The latter had been born of the Upsilon in 1875, and itself becoming inactive after three years, was revived in 1884, only to become inactive again in 1897. By the mid-nineties, the University of Pennsylvania had come to have an attendance of over 2,500 students, a number remarkable for the period. There were some fifteen Greek-letter fraternities. The alumni forces in Philadelphia had grown in numbers since the years of the original efforts to sustain a chapter in the University, while the fame of the institution brought to its halls each college year a half-score or more wearers of the White Cross. In the year 1895 – 1896, this group included a number of men in the professional schools or colleges who had been among the most enthusiastic chapter workers in their former colleges. Among these, a group of former Kappa men in the Medical Department determined that the time had come to revive the Phi Phi. These were George L. Megargee, Kappa ’99, Orville E. B. Bailey, Kappa ’99, and Epsilon ’99, and Iden M. Portser, Kappa ’98. An early and active co-adjutor in their plans was Ira A. Shimer, Alpha Rho ’97, also of the Medical Department, and president of the strongest Medical society. The other Sigma Chi members at the University rallied gladly to the plan. There was a conference with the local alumni at the home of Thomas R. Field, Omicron ’93, secretary of the Philadelphia Alumni Chapter, on the night of February 4, 1896, and on the next day, the petition was forwarded to Chicago. It contained the names of twelve Sigma Chis and four others: Charles B. Burke, ’99; Joseph T. DeSilver, ’99; Samuel A. Boyle, Jr., ’99; Harry Olewine, Theta, ’98; Daniel D. Stiltz, ’99; Fred R. Charlton, Chi, ’96; Iden M. Portser, Kappa, ’98; George L. Megargee, Kappa ’99; Frank A. Awl, Omicron, ’98; William H. Campbell, Alpha Chi, ’98; Willet P. Hughes, Beta ’97; Edward D. Mitchell, Jr., Zeta Zeta, ’98; Orville E. B. Bailey, Kappa, ’90 and Epsilon, ’99; Robert H. Mitchell, Zeta Zeta, ’97; Eugena A. Smith, Alpha Lambda, ’97; and Ira A. Shimer, Alpha Rho, ’97.24

 

Many strong considerations combined to give sanction to the proposal. The petitioners were well distributed among the several departments of the University but the fixed intention was with the chapter established, to build especially in the College of Liberal Arts.25 A chief difficulty of the old Phi Phi, of a membership scattered and distant in residence, was completely overcome in the dormitory system which had become established at the University. The prominence of “Pennsylvania” in athletics marked a new era of general college interest and favor for the institution. The Philadelphia alumni included many names honored in Sigma Chi, and in the public and professional life of their city. A leader among these for the new movement was Dr. S. Lewis Zeigler, Kappa, ’80, and a member of the former Phi Phi Class of ’85. Other such names were those of William V. NavLennep, Phi, ’76; Rufus E. Shapley, Omicron ’60; Albert P. Willis, Alpha Phi, ’90; Voorhees S.Anderson, Kappa, ’95; David B. Callaghan, Kappa, ’76;  William S. Steward, Iota, ’60; Eli H. Eldredge, Kappa ’83; Michael R. Minnich, Theta, ’70, and Philadelphia Alumni; and Edward E. Montgomery, Mu, ’71, and Philadelphia Alumni. The endorsement of the Alumni Chapter was enthusiastic and was quickly followed by an equal interest upon the part of other alumni chapters in the East, the active chapters in Pennsylvania, and of other chapters having representatives in the petitioning group. A formal investigation of the petition was made by Donald P. McPherson, Theta, ’89, of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, whose report was thoroughly favorable. Needless to say, an affirmation vote soon resulted, and Phi Phi of Sigma Chi entered upon its long career of prosperity through a memorable installation on the night of May 9, 1896.

 

The event took place at the Odd Fellows’ Hall, Philadelphia, and was in charge of Albert P. Willis, Alpha Phi, ’90, President of the Philadelphia Alumni chapter. The interest in the revival in the East was indicated by the attendance of some two hundred. The fact that many of the petitioners were already Sigma Chis of some years standing, gives added meaning to the report of the occasion that the actual neophytes were given a “thorough initiation.” Nevertheless, the noisy crowd was hushed into solemnity in the chanting by all present of a beautiful new initiation hymn, the words by Ruter W. Springer, Omega, ’87, and the music by Norman Landis, Theta ’94, and written it for the occasion. 

 

                        My brother, by this token,

                                Those vows are so lately spoken,

                                You know we much esteem you,

                                Worthy our name we deem you,

                                By friendship’s pure and holy tie

                                You’re bound to us in Sigma Chi.

 

The banquet was held at the Hotel Stanton. The menu card was in the best of style, a handsome memento of the occasion. The printed toast list was headed by the name of Dr. William G. Stewart, Iota, ’69, as toastmaster. A feature among the addresses was that by Dr. Robert Farnham, a founder of the Epsilon at Washington and of the first Phi Phi. Orville E. B. Bailey spoke for the new chapter under the theme, ”How We Did It,” and many other addresses worthy of the occasion were made ere the banquet closed.26

 

 The new chapter quickly found its place in the life of the University. A comfortable house was leased which during the Summer vacation was thoroughly renewed and fitted for chapter use.27 In the Fall, Frederick A. Dale, Russell Hastings, and Harry S. Marshall, all from the Alpha Chi entered the Medical School, while Edward W. Lowden, Theta, William E. Arrison, Alpha Rho, Edward W. Hope, Alpha Alpha, and David Atwood, Alpha Lambda, entered the College of Liberal Arts. It was before the time of large numbers of transfers to the great graduate institutions, and all who came were received directly into the active membership. The first regular initiates of the new Phi Phi were Charles G. Lister, ’98, and George A. Stevenson, ’00. These were followed, a little later in the year, 1896 – 1897, by Joseph H. Huston, ’01, Thomas Flavell, ’00; Lewis A. Dewing, ’01; and Charles Perry Wentz, ’01, the latter having played guard on the Princeton football team while at the College of New Jersey. Before Spring another quartet had been initiated: the Connell Brothers of Scranton, Theodore E. Connell, ’99 and Ezra H. Connell, ’98, loyal and enthusiastic for Sigma Chi in active as alumni life; J. Norman Risley, ’99; and Clifford B. Parker, ’00.28 For the first year of endeavor, Phi Phi had reason to be proud of her success in the initiations.  

 

The charter members of the new Phi Phi were thoroughly representative of the University’s activities, and especially so in the realm of athletics. Shimer and McAvoy were presidents of their respective societies in the medical and dental schools. Shimer was manager of the track team, and also manager of the University Courier the weekly paper. Upon the strong football of the year, McAvoy was the manager and Boyle left-end, and DeSilver reserve tackle. On the varsity crew, Boyle was the captain, McAvoy the coxswain, and Magargee at bow car. The various athletic contests brought numerous visiting Sigma Chis of the other eastern chapters, and this new fellowship was a feature of the life of the revived chapter which had been but little known in the days of its predecessor.29

 

The success of the first year in building up the membership was renewed year by year, and the new accessions were men who took a prominent part in the affairs of the University and honored the White Cross.30 Next to athletics, the musical affairs of the University perhaps most largely claimed the attention of the Phi Phi. Lewis A. Dewing was president of the Associated Musical clubs; McAvoy manager, and Smith assistant manager of the Glee, Banjo, and Mandolin Clubs. McGargee, Dewing, Smith, and Bailey, were members of the Glee Club, the first-named a soloist; Awl was on the Mandolin Club and whistling soloist. Huston and Lister were at the Banjo Club. Those were years when the alumni visiting the Phi Phi chapter, if lovers of music, were satisfied with harmonies that filled the house.

 

The new chapter at Philadelphia was especially active in its fraternal relations with other chapters and in all the interests of Sigma Chi at large. This was especially due to the location of the chapter upon the highways of travel so that its visitors were many, and to the fact of its numerous members by transfer from other chapters. The delegate of the revived chapter to its first Grand Chapter, the Twenty-third, at Nashville, Tennessee, 1897, was George L McAvoy, ’97. It was a proud and happy day when the word came to the Philadelphia alumni and the Phi Phi two years later, that their own mutual invitation for the entertainment of the Twenty-fourth Grand Chapter, of 1899, had been accepted by the Fraternity. That great event when it came, found the entire active chapter and many of its alumni both of the older and of the new group assembled and ready to do the honors of the occasion. Of this number Louis A. Dewing, ’01, was honored with the official representation of the Phi Phi as its delegate.

 

The Grand Chapter marked something of a crowning era, the fifth anniversary of the re-establishment being celebrated in the Spring of 1901. The charter and earlier members had come to their graduations with increasing influence for Sigma Chi and, after finishing tier courses, the chapter was a magnet to bring them back upon visits of encouragement and inspiration. The Phi Phi held its representative character in student affairs and had in Peter D. Overfield, ’01, famous center of the football team, an athlete of national reputation in college athletics.31 Each year, notable chapter banquets were made possible by the union of these events with gatherings of the strong Philadelphia Alumni Chapter. In the first years of the new century, the chapter felt the loss of its strong leaders through the earlier period, but the Alumni chapter was a strong help. Numbers of the local alumni met with the boys at the chapter meetings and, in the Fall of 1903, installed the group in a new and pleasant home.32 The years which ensued fulfilled the prophecy of the chapter historian of that day that the trying times were over and that “the pace which has been set by our older men will be maintained by the chapter of today and the future, and Phi Phi shall rank second to none.”33

 

  • A letter of Brother Field, of February 8, 1886, shows that, while the Philadelphia alumni were looking hopefully toward a revival of the chapter, the movement as it arose was wholly a spontaneous one among the men at the University:

 

— “Although we have long considered the question of reviving Phi Phi, we have never taken any further steps in the matter, and have always met on an alumni chapter, without the college men. The present movement has been brought before us in practical working shape entirely by the college men and those men who will join the establishment of the chapter are the number of Sigma Chis who are here in the different departments, and who come as Sigs from other colleges. I think the average is two or three a year, giving us eight to twelve men, outside of new members. All these men board here, and their actual expenses would more than support a house.— Any loyal member could not but have been delighted with the enthusiasm of the present members at the last meeting and the actual result of their work. They pledged six good men to help them. This makes as a foundation eighteen good men in all, and when they came as such a foundation eighteen good men in all, and when they came as such and as much as said, ‘Here we are, and here is what we can do,’ not an alumnus was there, who could but support them. We have about two hundred Sigs in the city and vicinity – many who would take an interest if the chapter were revived here – and a good alumni chapter which is already interested.”

 

  • It was understood, however, that the new chapter would desirably continue to have strength in the professional schools. As an institution famous for its graduate departments, the attendance in these was large and their full recognition in college activities was the College department. The few fraternities which sought to limit themselves largely to the letter kept club rooms downtown, two miles away from the University, and depended largely upon a local constituency which for the most part made up the College enrollment.

 

  • The list of speakers included: Dr. Francis A. Scratchley, Zeta, ’77, president of the New York Alumni Chapter, Alfred K. Leuckel, Alpha Rho, ’87, Rovert McMeen, Iota, ’64, the historic chapter at Jefferson College’ Roderick Pl. Fisher, Alpha Kappa, ’88, of New York Alumni; Albeert P. Willis, for the Philadelphia Alumni chapter; Edward S. Taylor, Alpha Rho ’96; Clifford B. McCalls, Alpha Rho, ’95; Michael R. Minnich, Theta, ’70; Clarence B. Raymond, Alpha Lambda, ’92; Stacy B. Opdyke, Upsilon, ’70; for the old Philadelphia “Parent” chapter at the Polytechnic: John B. McPherson, Theta ’83; Dr. S. Lewis Ziegler, Kappa, ’80, and Phi Phi ’85; and members of the new chapter.

 

  • The location was 3712 Walnut Street. Two years later the chapter moved to a house not far distant on Walnut Street, No 3728. In the Fall of 1900 desirable new quarters were found at 3447 Woodland Avenue, just opposite the College Gate.

 

  • These four, as with several initiates named, as earlier, were from homes of marked prominence in public or professional life, and of Brother Parker, the same was true with the addition of a family relation distinguished in Sigma Chi. He was the son of Thomas S. Parker, Omicron, ’59, and the nephew of Joseph B. Parker, Omicron ’60.

 

  • The single defeat of the Pennsylvania eleven that year was an unexpected one at the hands of Lafayette. The captain of the Lafayette team being George O. Barclay, ex-Kappa, ’98, who scored the touchdown and kicked the goal which brought the 6 to 4 defeat.

 

  • Initiates or members by transfer of the earlier years, in addition to those named hereinabove, were: Curtis S. Foster, ’98; Arthur P. Woodward, ’99; Charles L. Ashley, Alexander V. McDonald, and Eugene B. Wilkins, of the class of ’00; Lewis W. Callan, John T. Engeman, Carroll H. Gerry, Peter D. Overfield, William D. White, Jr., and Walter W. Wilson, all of ’01. In 1902 were listed ten names, a number not again equaled until several years later: William Jordan, Jr., Edward R. Kapp, Elston F. King, Joseph Megary, William H. Noblett, William B. Reibenack, R. Roscoe Sanborn, Edward B. Shellenberger, John J. Singer, Bruce H. Trimmer, and Benjamin G. Wilson.

 

  • Peter DeLome Overfield entered the University of Pennsylvania in 1896, with a reputation for good football following him from academy days. He was made center on the University team immediately, being the second man to win a position on the team in his first year. He was again at center in the great championship team of ’97, and after military service in Puerto Rico, returned to college in time for the season of ’98. That Fall he was chosen as captain of the football team, but out of college loyalties yielded the honor to others. Aside from his football abilities, Brother Overfield was also a member of the University crew and was the president of the popular undergraduate organization, the Houston Club. Brother Overfield was accorded an undisputed place as center on the “All-American” team, by such authorities as Walter Camp, and Casper Whitney. Camp wrote of him:

 

“It was even more creditable to Overfield that he was able to perform such excellent center work from the fact that physically he is not heavy enough to be on an equality with the men he was likely to face. It was necessary, therefore, for him to make up with skill what he lacked in pounds. This he did, playing a hard, vigorous, and thoroughly scientific center throughout the season. He is one of the speediest centers we have ever had, accurate and always careful.”

 

The football career of Brother Overfield closed, under the four-year rule, with the season of ’99. Following his graduation from the Law Department, he sought his fortunes in the Southwest and has attained an honored position on the bench at Oatman, Arizona.

 

  • This was at 3611 Walnut Street, a favorite neighborhood for house purposes, as being on the direct route to Franklin Field, and otherwise convenient of location. Subsequent homes of the Phi Phi were at 3604 Walnut, and 3608 Walnut, from the latter of which the chapter moved into its own magnificent new home, the Drexel Mansion, in the Fall of 1920.

 

  • Letter of W. Horace Hepburn, Jr., ’03, October 25, 1903.